I recently rediscovered this work while I was cleaning through some old files and present it now as the beginnings of a piece of work and no more than that.
A small piece of action research.
The research question ‘does enjoyment raise attainment in
science?’ was tested on my PGCE. At the time I found that there was a relation
between enjoyment and attainment. When students enjoy a subject they are more
likely to engage with what is being offered to them. This means that they are
more likely to complete tasks and more importantly they are more likely to
remember information being presented. This recall of activities and knowledge
is important in raising their attainment.
Since beginning teaching I have noticed that it is harder
and harder to keep students enjoying a subject throughout the year. There seem
to be definite topics where making the subject interesting and engaging is
easier than others. A lot of this depends upon the teacher and their interests
but also on the nature of the subject material at hand. I have blogged on the
importance for teachers to stay excited by their subject but is this enough to
continue to push students forwards?
On area that seems to come up a lot in conversation with
other teachers is that students are so disaffected with school and learning
that whatever the activity they are reluctant to engage. Teachers feel this
reflects badly on their lesson rather than the issue be with the learners and
their priorities. I have tried various ways of combating this in my teaching.
From relevance of subject matter to constant use of practical science as lesson
‘hooks’ in order to bring students into the topic that is being delivered.
However as you can imagine this constant planning, re-planning and attempts at
creativity (or finding other peoples creativity) is time consuming and
exhausting when attempted over a long period of time.
The question of engagement came up when I started at my current
school. I took over two year 9 groups of very disaffected students who had been
removed from early entry GCSE owing to their poor performance. This had led to
lots of the students to have ‘given up’ on science already before their course
had even gotten going. Part of my brief when I took them over was to try to get
them back interested or at least engaging with science ready for year 10. I
feel that I achieved a measure of success in their respect although at the time
it felt like an uphill struggle. This year I have a group of year 9’s again who
are in early entry GCSE this time on the C/D boarderline. Being determined that
the students would not become disaffected with GCSE science I set about trying
to keep them focused on the subject.
I decided to base my teaching on positive reinforcement and
to not focus on any negative behaviour but over the top praise those who had
got on with work. The lesson structures and plans were the same as they would
have been otherwise. There were only 3 real rules that I put in place for this;
1.
Make sure to praise those who were on task and
make sure that good work was publically highlighted.
2.
Rather than focus on bad behaviour I would
relate it to respect, politeness and manners.
3.
I would try to individualise feedback but from a
positive perspective focusing on what the student had done well first and
foremost and how I felt they could improve to do even better.
I have been very conscious of my language use during this.
At first constant positivity was difficult and some phrases stuck in my throat
of felt ‘clunky’ however I remember feeling the same with normal praise on my
PGCE. As with that situation the more positive I was the easier it became.
However I was keen to ensure that I never was disingenuous as I feel learners
are quick to pick up on this. I was also keen to make sure that when students
were asking me questions or showing work that my attention was fully focused on
them, as a school pupil feedback showed that they know and dislike when a
teacher is not paying attention.
B1
The first unit was B1 (biology). I felt that the main issue
with most of the students was not being used to the GCSE questions and so not
fitting their long answers to the questions asked. However the recall of information
was pleasing. As a result I was positive about their results and where they had
gone well while at the same time highlighting the areas in which they could
improve. This was even though their results in terms of target grades were not
amazing.
P1
In many cases the results for P1 dropped. However the recall
of knowledge was still fairly good unfortunately most people made silly
mistakes and errors on a long answer questions about diffraction in a glass
block. Again the response from me was positive and built around improvement and
building on what had gone well rather than focusing on where the students had
made mistakes in a negative way. There is also a point to make that many
students struggle with the mathematics inherent in physics (in a similar way
students who are not very linguistic tend to struggle with biology).
C1
The results from C1 show the closest results to the
predicted grades. The increase in some students is remarkable. This is pleasing
in two ways. Firstly the students have started to take on board the advice and
encouragement that had been given and their results had improved accordingly.
There were more noticeable mistakes in terms of knowledge recall in this exam
and less in terms of how to answer the question. Secondly some students who had
shown they were making good progress were allowed to take the higher tier paper
for the first time and their results were very pleasing indeed (the A’s and B’s
shown).
Conclusion
There is strong evidence that consistent positive
reinforcement can improve performance. However there are several points to make
with regard this study. Firstly that the improvements were also based upon the
students getting used to the standard expected at GCSE. The importance of this
cannot be overstated as often the style of exam questions shifts dramatically
from key stage 3 to 4. Also it should be noted that behaviour in this class was
of a good standard generally and this type of approach may not work with a
class that requires a firmer hand. This class were taught with a mixture of independent
tasks and directed study as well as some practical work. If the study was to be
reproduced it would be interesting to see the impact of greater autonomy and
possibly even utilising more enquiry based learning methods.
It should also be noted that very little marking was
provided outside of homework exercises and exam practice. In fact it could be
argued that this form of feedback was much stronger than the positive
reinforcement as it helped to shape and prepare the students from one test to
another.
However what has come out from this study is that the
attitude of the learners towards science has improved and this has seen to be
reflected in their effort levels, which in turn has been reflected in their results.
Data
Student
|
B1 Test Sc GCSE
|
P1 Test Sc GCSE
|
C1 Test Sc GCSE
|
Target Grade
|
|
1
|
D
|
F+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
2
|
C+
|
C-
|
A
|
B
|
|
3
|
D+
|
E+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
4
|
D
|
D+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
5
|
D
|
C
|
B
|
C
|
|
6
|
D+
|
C
|
D-
|
C
|
|
7
|
F
|
C+
|
A
|
C
|
|
8
|
D
|
C+
|
B
|
C
|
|
9
|
D
|
D-
|
C+
|
C
|
|
10
|
D
|
E-
|
C+
|
C
|
|
11
|
C+
|
C-
|
B
|
C
|
|
12
|
F+
|
E-
|
F+
|
C
|
|
13
|
D
|
G+
|
C
|
C
|
|
14
|
C
|
C+
|
B+
|
C
|
|
15
|
D
|
D+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
16
|
D
|
D+
|
D+
|
C
|
|
17
|
E+
|
C-
|
C+
|
C
|
|
18
|
E
|
G+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
19
|
C+
|
C+
|
A-
|
C
|
|
20
|
E+
|
D+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
21
|
E+
|
C-
|
C
|
C
|
|
22
|
E
|
D
|
C+
|
C
|
|
23
|
E+
|
D
|
C-
|
C
|
|
24
|
F+
|
E+
|
E+
|
C
|
|
25
|
E+
|
D+
|
D-
|
C
|
|
26
|
D
|
F-
|
C+
|
C
|
|
27
|
C
|
D-
|
B
|
C
|
|
28
|
E
|
D-
|
D-
|
C
|
|
29
|
C+
|
D+
|
C+
|
C
|
|
30
|
E+
|
E-
|
C+
|
C
|
Carol Dweck
Growth ethos – ability can be cultivated and that effort is
required for learning. Use of process orientated and task orientated praise.
Avoidance of relating praise to personal attributes otherwise it can limited
the belief of others that they can succeed. Instead by having praise based upon
the task or process then students can see why someone else is being praised,
especially when building praise around striving to succeed. It seems to be
about building the idea that it is ok to fail providing you keep moving
forwards in order to get there in the end.
Dweck, C. S. (1999) Self Theories: Their Role in
Motivation, Personality, and Development . Hove: Psychology Press,
Taylor and Francis Group.
No comments:
Post a Comment